What is COMAR’s approach to conflict resolution in regulatory matters?

COMAR’s approach to conflict resolution in regulatory matters emphasizes establishing procedures for appeals and hearings. This framework allows individuals and entities affected by regulatory decisions the opportunity to challenge those decisions through a formal process. Hearings provide a structured environment where evidence can be presented, arguments can be made, and decisions can be reviewed in a fair and impartial manner.

This procedural approach is essential for ensuring transparency and accountability within regulatory frameworks, allowing for a balanced assessment of the issues involved. Furthermore, it aligns with fundamental principles of due process, which are vital in any regulatory context.

While other options may play roles in broader conflict resolution strategies, they do not capture COMAR’s primary focus on procedural due process through appeals and hearings. Mandating penalties can be part of enforcing regulations but does not address the resolution aspect. Offering mediation services may be a part of conflict resolution but is not a primary method established by COMAR. Similarly, implementing strict timelines might enhance efficiency but does not directly relate to the core conflict resolution strategy that COMAR prioritizes.