What type of violations typically require an administrative hearing under COMAR?

Serious violations that pose significant risk typically require an administrative hearing under COMAR because they often involve substantial threats to public health, safety, or welfare. These types of violations necessitate a formal review process to evaluate the issues, determine the extent of noncompliance, and decide on appropriate enforcement actions. Administrative hearings ensure that due process is followed, allowing for examination of evidence, witness testimonies, and the opportunity for the entity in violation to present their case, which is crucial for maintaining accountability and regulatory compliance.

In contrast, minor clerical errors usually do not warrant the same level of scrutiny or formal proceedings, as they do not significantly impact overall compliance or safety. Advisory compliance failures often involve recommendations rather than enforceable actions and therefore may not necessitate formal hearings. Finally, not all reported complaints lead to administrative hearings, as many may be resolved through other means or determined to be unfounded. Therefore, focusing on serious violations aligns with the fundamental purpose of administrative hearings in the regulatory framework established by COMAR.